INDEX

PREVIOUS ARTICLE

NEXT ARTICLE

 
     


Committed to Being the Best

WINTER
2006-2007



Foreign Insight

by Del Brahm

IRAN

 

Recent reports indicate that Iran is in the process of spending huge amounts of money in increasing their ocean ports capacity and their fleet of ocean vessels.  These reports state that they expect to vastly increase their global trade, and in particular their large oil resources. 

May we hope that their shipping more oil around the world will steady or reduce the price of oil?  Even though the United States does not trade with Iran, will those countries who buy oil from Iran buy less oil from the countries the U.S. buys oil from, bringing the supply of oil up and the price down?  May we hope that Iran does not pursue nuclear bombs in hopes of not getting their improved ocean ports and fleet blown up? 

Global trade has been shown to be a deterrent to war.  As a rule people who trade with each other do not make war with each other.  Hopefully Iran will someday not be on the boycott list and allowed to once again trade with the U.S.

SHORT SEA SHIPPING

 

We have discussed the merits of short sea shipping before from the standpoint of avoiding the high cost of ocean port dredging.  More and more very large ocean containerships are being built, which are not suited to calling at all U.S. ports, unless the ports are improved and deepened.  These new and larger vessels are becoming more efficient in terms of moving more cargo faster and using less fuel.

The ideas we discussed earlier involved using the new monster containerships at the naturally very deep ports and feed containers to them from the shallow draft ports.  We also mentioned going back to using the Great Lakes shipping from some three decades ago.  Now there are indications that the Maritime Administration is about to announce some interesting and innovative changes.  Among them could be the proposal to eliminate the harbor maintenance tax on domestic cargoes at U.S. ports in order to entice more cargo to the water.  Another could be incentives to route hazardous cargo via water, rather than through cities via truck or rail.  We need to stay tuned for changes.

 

MEXICAN TRUCKING

 

On February 23, 2007 U.S. Secretary of Transportation, Mary E. Peters, authorized a one-year pilot program to allow cross border trucking between the U.S. and Mexico, beyond the current twenty-five mile limit.  This program will allow approximately 100 U.S. truckers to deliver international cargo anywhere in Mexico, and it will allow approximately 100 Mexican truckers to deliver international cargo anywhere in the U.S.  Both the U.S. and Mexican truckers will be required to meet all safety and security standards of both countries and maintain insurance in both countries. 

This pilot program will only involve international cargo.  Mexican truckers will not be allowed to haul U.S. domestic freight from Atlanta to Dallas, and U.S. truckers will not be allowed to haul Mexican domestic freight from Monterrey to Mexico City.  It may only be international freight originating in one of the two countries and delivering in the other of the two countries.  This will, however, eliminate part of the bottleneck of transferring freight from one trucker to another at the U.S./Mexican border.  If you have freight moving into or out of Mexico, now would be a good time to talk with your trucker and your forwarder/broker to see if they are participating in this new program.  This could cut down on some of the transit time and cost of freight between the U.S. and Mexico. 

INTERMODAL EQUIPMENT

 

Speaking of international freight, the U.S. Department of Transportation has proposed new regulations specifying responsibilities of the ocean carrier and the trucker regarding the maintenance and condition of the ocean container and the chassis.  You may remember some years ago a piece fell off a chassis on a freeway near the Mitchell International Airport and went under a van and caused the van to explode and kill a number of people in the van.

There is an ongoing concern about who is responsible for the condition of the intermodal equipment regardless of the interchange agreement between the ocean carrier and the trucker. 

The proposed regulation outlined in the Federal Register asks for comments until the deadline of March 21, 2007.  It will be interesting to see how any resulting legislation determines not only who is responsible for the condition of the intermodal equipment, but who and how a determination is made that the equipment is safe for the highways.  Stay tuned.

GENERAL AVERAGE

 

You have most likely seen pictures in magazines, newspapers and on TV about severe damage, which large containerships recently sustained in ocean storms.  Some containers were lost overboard or intentionally jettisoned overboard in an effort to save the ship and the crew and the rest of the cargo. 

This is a primary instance when General Average is declared.  General Average is a method whereby everybody who owns any part of the ship or anything on it participates in the payment of damage to the lost or damaged cargo, whether their cargo is damaged or not.  Whether you are a buyer or seller of international freight, be sure somebody has insured the freight from warehouse to warehouse and that the insurance includes General Average.

 

WINTER

 

Hopefully, by the time you read this article, much of the snow will be gone, and the long Winter will soon be out of here and Spring won’t be too far behind.  If you’re in international trade, are you able to travel to the other side of the equator during our cold season?